LLM Workflow Diagnostics

Diagnose your AI workflow before upgrading your model.

Reduce token waste. Improve output quality. Diagnose the workflow before upgrading the model.

full assessments completed

avg overall workflow score

quick checks run

audited with AI evidence

// sample data — be the first to contribute

The Problem

Stop paying for bigger models to fix workflow problems.

The waste

Sessions bloat with re-explained context. Token spend climbs while output quality drops.

The cause

Workflow gaps — no briefing, no context hygiene, no session discipline — force the model to rediscover context every turn.

The fix

Diagnose where your workflow leaks tokens, then close those gaps before paying for a bigger model.

// the diagnostic →

The fix isn't a bigger model — it's a tighter loop.

Self-score vs. Evidence-based

Where your gut and the data disagree is where improvement lives.

Self-scoreYour gut

Project & Context Setup

75%

AI-audit33pp gap

Project & Context Setup

42%

The Framework

Seven dimensions of LLM workflow quality.

Each one is a place where unclear context, weak prompts, or poor session hygiene burns tokens and degrades output.

Token simulator — toggle practices below

BaselineWith your practices
T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9T10

Total: ~4,368 tokens

Illustrative — directional research, not benchmarked

Tokens saved / mo

~0

API cost saved / mo

$0.00

Energy saved / mo

0.0 Wh · $0.000

Projected over ~200 sessions/mo. Energy estimate per public LLM inference research; actual values vary by model, hardware, and provider.

Diagnose your workflow in 5 minutes.